A Require International Marriage Laws

I just recently viewed a CNN program which centred on “abducted daughters” (from multicultural marital relationships) who were unwillingly given away in marital relationships in Islamic states by their daddies. Usually, the daddies were from these Islamic states. While contemplating over why some states still decline women their rights to select whom to wed, the crucial question I am likewise aiming to address is “Which international law governs inter-religious and inter-country marital relationships?”

The genuine issue is whose belief bypasses in an inter-country and inter-religious marital relationship. Should the dad dictate the beliefs of his daughter till she is 18 or should the mother? Whilst love still stands as the standard foundation for a successful marital relationship, weding an immigrant with a various religion/beliefs requires a more concrete foundation – – such as a signed agreement

. Some women wed male immigrants without totally comprehending his background, his beliefs …… and most importantly, the beliefs of his individuals. Some might argue that when they married their other halves, he was a complimentary thinker. This holds true specifically of westernized guys. This most likely changes when the guy has to return to his roots – – his individuals and their beliefs……. and they often return home.

Which law secures children from inter-religious and inter-country marital relationships? Which written law states that the guy can not take his daughters back to his roots and wed them off to whoever he wants? Which law mentions that a daddy can not forbid his daughters to go home and visit their mother? Which international law states that a woman forced to make love with a hubby she was unwillingly married to is pure rape? Which international law states that a woman who has her passport taken by her dad is denied her rights?

As the world becomes truly global, maybe it is time the United Nations begun to look at International Marriage laws which safeguard the children from inter-country marital relationships. Can these children truly be protected in spite of the political barriers that dominate?

The obvious answer stays that the end to “kidnapping” is the facility of international marital relationship laws which nations can be held responsible for. Whilst couples await these laws, it might be practical to sign arrangements in a law court to safeguard coming children. The question, then, is “whose court of law?”

I just recently viewed a CNN program which centred on “abducted daughters” (from multicultural marital relationships) who were unwillingly provided away in marital relationships in Islamic states by their daddies. While contemplating over why some states still decline women their rights to select whom to wed, the crucial question I am likewise trying to address is “Which international law governs inter-religious and inter-country marital relationships?”

Which law secures children from inter-religious and inter-country marital relationships? The obvious answer stays that the end to “kidnapping” is the facility of international marital relationship laws which nations can be held responsible for.

to read more interesting articles -

Go online to

Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a Reply